Virtually Guided Palate Lateral Wall, TAD-Supported Expansion in Craniofacial Skeletally Mature Adolescents and Young Adults.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Different temporary anchorage device (TAD)-assisted rapid palatal expanders may be used to treat malocclusions involving the transverse dimension and, in many instances, prevent more complex situations in the future. Each style of expander has advantages and disadvantages. The acrylic type of TAD-supported palate lateral wall expander is a reliable and cost-effective appliance for expansion treatment in adolescents and young adults (ie, aged 13 to 21). In comparison, other palatal expander designs are more suitable for older patients. One advantage of an acrylic TAD-supported palate lateral wall expander system is that it can be used for both orthopedic expansions (ie, nonsurgical TAD-supported only) and surgically assisted rapid palatal expansions (ie, with the aid of minimally invasive corticotomies) in patients who do not respond to nonsurgical expansion. This article presents general diagnostic considerations regarding maxillary transverse deficiencies, discusses the importance of palatal expansion in managing malocclusions, and describes protocols for nonsurgical and surgical management of transverse deficiencies with an acrylic TAD-supported virtually guided palate lateral wall expander.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".