MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Internetization and Digital Democracy

2023· book-chapter· en· W4366608265 on OpenAlexaff
Constantine E. Passaris

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in information quality and management · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Media and Politics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemocracyTransformational leadershipScope (computer science)Political scienceCarvingSociologyPublic relationsGeographyComputer scienceLawArchaeologyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the confluence of two subject areas that are at the forefront of technological change and the evolution of the democratic process. Internetization and digital democracy have emerged as game changers in the 21st century. Internetization has redefined global outreach and electronic connectivity. Digitalization has empowered democracy to explore new frontiers. Both have enhanced the scope and substance of electronic connectivity and digital democracy. Each is carving a large legacy footprint and discovering new operational horizons. Both have the capacity to lead transformational change in two core areas of human engagement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in information quality and managementSame topicSocial Media and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207