MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Recent Breakthroughs in Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing towards Autonomous AI (Plenary Panel Report-I of IEEE ICCI*CC'22)

2022· article· en· W4366674452 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Computing and Networks
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversity of GuelphUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive computingInformaticsCognitionComputer scienceLIDACognitive roboticsArtificial intelligenceImplementationComputational intelligenceCognitive architectureCyberneticsRobotData scienceKnowledge managementEngineeringPsychologySoftware engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Basic research in Cognitive Informatics (CI) and Cognitive Computing (CC) provides fundamental theories of intelligence science for Autonomous AI (AAI) and cognitive systems. The field of CI and CC has led to general AI technologies triggered by the transdisciplinary advances in brain, intelligence, computer, knowledge, cognitive, robotic, and cybernetic sciences for engineering implementations. This paper presents a summary of the plenary panel (Part I) on the “Recent Breakthroughs in Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing towards AAI” in the 21st IEEE International ICCI*CC Conference (ICCI*CC'22). Strategic CI/CC applications are presented in cognitive systems, AAI, cognitive robots, intelligent vehicles, AI knowledge learning, autonomous intelligence generation, and safety-and-mission-critical systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Computing and NetworksFrench-language works237,207