MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Recent Breakthroughs in Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing towards Autonomous AI (Plenary Panel Report-I of IEEE ICCI*CC'22)

2022· article· en· W4366674452 on OpenAlexaff
Yingxu Wang, Bernard Widrow, Witold Pedrycz, Janusz Kacprzyk, Sam Kwong, Konstantin.N. Plataniotis, Ling Guan, Petros Spachos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Computing and Networks
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversity of GuelphUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive computingInformaticsCognitionComputer scienceLIDACognitive roboticsArtificial intelligenceImplementationComputational intelligenceCognitive architectureCyberneticsRobotData scienceKnowledge managementEngineeringPsychologySoftware engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Basic research in Cognitive Informatics (CI) and Cognitive Computing (CC) provides fundamental theories of intelligence science for Autonomous AI (AAI) and cognitive systems. The field of CI and CC has led to general AI technologies triggered by the transdisciplinary advances in brain, intelligence, computer, knowledge, cognitive, robotic, and cybernetic sciences for engineering implementations. This paper presents a summary of the plenary panel (Part I) on the “Recent Breakthroughs in Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing towards AAI” in the 21st IEEE International ICCI*CC Conference (ICCI*CC'22). Strategic CI/CC applications are presented in cognitive systems, AAI, cognitive robots, intelligent vehicles, AI knowledge learning, autonomous intelligence generation, and safety-and-mission-critical systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0070.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Computing and NetworksFrench-language works237,207