De novo sequencing of multiple SILAC-based tandem mass spectra
Bibliographic record
Abstract
De novo peptide sequencing of tandem mass spec-trometry (MS/MS) has emerged as an important technology for peptide sequencing in proteomics. To increase the accuracy and practicality of de novo sequencing, some previous algorithms used multiple spectra to identify the peptide sequence. In this approach, we focus on de novo sequencing of multiple SILAC-based tandem mass spectra. SILAC technology uses medium containing different kinds of isotope-labeled essential amino acids, usually Arginine(R) and Lysine(K), to label newly synthesized proteins with stable isotopes during cell growth. Multiple MS/MS spectra for the same peptide sequence are produced by spectrometry after the SILAC samples are processed by LC-MS/MS shotgun proteomics. Based on the factors such as the type of isotope labeling, precursor ion mass, etc., multiple spectra with different type of SILAC PTMs for the same peptide can be used to identify the peptide sequence. In this paper, we present two de novo sequencing algorithms to compute the peptide sequence which are based on total number of SILAC modifications and based on the numbers of SILAC Arginine(R) and Lysine(K).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".