MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366707518 · doi:10.4000/books.eurorbem.2832

La réception des œuvres de Henryk Sienkiewicz en Italie

2018· book-chapter· fr· W4366707518 on OpenAlexaff
Witold Zahorski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicItalian Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsCanadian Historical Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans une lettre adressée en 1900 à son premier traducteur italien, Domenico Ciampoli, écrivain et slavisant, Henryk Sienkiewicz écrit :Je crois que chaque homme a deux patries ; l’une est la sienne, toute proche, l’autre, l’Italie. Tout ce qui relève dans notre vie du domaine de l’esprit, de la religion, de l’art, de la science, toute la culture intellectuelle nous est arrivée de là. En fait, nous sommes tous, si ce n’est les fils, du moins les petits-fils de l’Italie.Dans un passage de son ro...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicItalian Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207