Neuroticism and emotion regulation: An effective connectivity analysis of large-scale resting-state brain networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The neurotic personality has an impact on the regulation of basic negative emotions such as anger, fear, and sadness. There has been extensive research in search of functional connectivity biomarkers of neuroticism and basic negative emotions but there is a lack of research based on effective connectivity. In the current research, we intended to determine the significance of causal interaction of three large-scale resting-state networks – default mode, salience, and executive networks – to predict neuroticism and basic negative emotions. In this study, a large-scale human connectome project dataset comprising functional MRI scans and self-reported scores of neuroticism and negative emotions of 1079 subjects, was utilized. Spectral dynamic causal modelling and parametric empirical Bayes was used to estimate the subject-level effective connectivity parameters and their group-level associations with the neuroticism and emotional scores. Leave-one-out cross-validation using parametric empirical Bayes was employed for prediction analysis. Our results for heightened emotions showed that the self-connection of right hippocampus can predict individuals with high fear, self-connections of dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex can predict individuals with high sadness. High anger, low sadness, and neuroticism scores of any emotion category except low fear, could not be predicted using triple network effective connectivity. Our findings revealed that the causal (directed) connections of the resting-state triple network can potentially serve as a connectomic signature for people with high and low fear, high sadness, low anger, and neuroticism with low fear.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".