Performance characterization of freeform finished surfaces of potassium dihydrogen phosphate using fluid jet polishing with a nonaqueous slurry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KDP) and its deuterated analog (DKDP) are unique nonlinear optical materials for high power laser systems. They are used widely for frequency conversion and polarization control by virtue of the ability to grow optical-quality crystals at apertures suitable for fusion-class laser systems. Existing methods for freeform figuring of KDP/DKDP optics do not produce surfaces with sufficient laser-induced-damage thresholds (LIDT's) for operation in the ultraviolet portion of high-peak-power laser systems. In this work, we investigate fluid jet polishing (FJP) using a nonaqueous slurry as a sub-aperture finishing method for producing freeform KDP surfaces. This method was used to selectively polish surface areas to different depths on the same substrate with removals ranging from 0.16 μm to 5.13 μm. The finished surfaces demonstrated a slight increase in roughness as the removal depth increased along with a small number of fracture pits. Laser damage testing with 351 nm, 1 ns pulses demonstrated excellent surface damage thresholds, with the highest values in areas devoid of fracture pits. This work demonstrates, for the first time, a method that enables fabrication of a waveplate that provides tailored polarization randomization that can be scaled to meter-sized optics. Furthermore, this method is based on FJP technology that incorporates a nonaqueous slurry specially designed for use with KDP. This novel nonaqueous FJP process can be also used for figuring other types of materials that exhibit similar challenging inherent properties such as softness, brittleness, water-solubility, and temperature sensitivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".