MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Accurate Bayesian segmentation of thalamic nuclei using diffusion MRI and an improved histological atlas

2023· article· en· W4366752941 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Henry F. J. Tregidgo, Sonja Soskic, Juri Althonayan, Chiara Maffei, Koen Van Leemput, Polina Golland, Ricardo Insausti, Garikoitz Lerma‐Usabiaga, César Caballero‐Gaudes, Pedro M. Paz‐Alonso, Anastasia Yendiki, Daniel C. Alexander, Martina Bocchetta, Jonathan D. Rohrer, Juan Eugenio Iglesias

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilUCLH Biomedical Research CentreEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsUniversity of California, San DiegoGenentechNational Institutes of HealthHorizon 2020UK Dementia Research InstituteNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeIXICOHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeServierEisaiWolfson FoundationEli Lilly and CompanyBrain Research UKNational Institute on AgingNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchEuropean Research CouncilNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationAlzheimer’s Research UKPfizerBiogenBioClinicaF. Hoffmann-La RocheAlzheimer's SocietyUniversity College LondonUniversity of Southern CaliforniaWellcome TrustSynarcMedpaceBristol-Myers SquibbNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationEuropean CommissionAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeMedical Research CouncilMeso Scale DiagnosticsAlzheimer's AssociationFoundation for the National Institutes of Health
KeywordsDiffusion MRINeuroimagingSegmentationWhite matterArtificial intelligenceThalamusComputer scienceBayesian probabilityProbabilistic logicMagnetic resonance imagingPattern recognition (psychology)Brain atlasNeurosciencePsychologyMedicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The human thalamus is a highly connected brain structure, which is key for the control of numerous functions and is involved in several neurological disorders. Recently, neuroimaging studies have increasingly focused on the volume and connectivity of the specific nuclei comprising this structure, rather than looking at the thalamus as a whole. However, accurate identification of cytoarchitectonically designed histological nuclei on standard in vivo structural MRI is hampered by the lack of image contrast that can be used to distinguish nuclei from each other and from surrounding white matter tracts. While diffusion MRI may offer such contrast, it has lower resolution and lacks some boundaries visible in structural imaging. In this work, we present a Bayesian segmentation algorithm for the thalamus. This algorithm combines prior information from a probabilistic atlas with likelihood models for both structural and diffusion MRI, allowing segmentation of 25 thalamic labels per hemisphere informed by both modalities. We present an improved probabilistic atlas, incorporating thalamic nuclei identified from histology and 45 white matter tracts surrounding the thalamus identified in ultra-high gradient strength diffusion imaging. We present a family of likelihood models for diffusion tensor imaging, ensuring compatibility with the vast majority of neuroimaging datasets that include diffusion MRI data. The use of these diffusion likelihood models greatly improves identification of nuclear groups versus segmentation based solely on structural MRI. Dice comparison of 5 manually identifiable groups of nuclei to ground truth segmentations show improvements of up to 10 percentage points. Additionally, our chosen model shows a high degree of reliability, with median test-retest Dice scores above 0.85 for four out of five nuclei groups, whilst also offering improved detection of differential thalamic involvement in Alzheimer's disease (AUROC 81.98%). The probabilistic atlas and segmentation tool will be made publicly available as part of the neuroimaging package FreeSurfer (https://freesurfer.net/fswiki/ThalamicNucleiDTI).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImageSame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207