MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366754135 · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2023.04.013

Analytic Result Variation for High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin: Interpretation and Consequences

2023· article· en· W4366754135 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Peter A. Kavsak, Lorna Clark, Saranya Arnoldo, Amy Lou, Jennifer Shea, Shaun Eintracht, Andrew W. Lyon, Vipin Bhayana, Laurel Thorlacius, Joshua E. Raizman, Albert K.Y. Tsui, Rose Djiana, Michael Chen, Yun Huang, Ronald A. Booth, Christopher R. McCudden, Joël Lavoie, Daniel R. Beriault, David Blank, Angela W.S. Fung, Barry Hoffman, Jennifer Taher, Julie St-Cyr, Paul S. F. Yip, Emilie P. Belley‐Côté, Beth L. Abramson, Bjug Borgundvaag, Steven Friedman, Susanna Mak, Jesse McLaren, Brian Steinhart, Jacob A. Udell, Harindra C. Wijeysundera, Paul Atkinson, Samuel Campbell, Kavish Chandra, Jafna L. Cox, Sharon L. Mulvagh, Ata-Ur-Rehman Quraishi, Annabel Chen‐Tournoux, Gregory A. Clark, Eli Segal, Neville Suskin, Amer M. Johri, Marco L.A. Sivilotti, Habibat Garuba, Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Simon D. Robinson, Frank Scheuermeyer, Karin H. Humphries, Martin Than, John W. Pickering, Andrew Worster, Nicholas L. Mills, P.J. Devereaux, Allan S. Jaffe

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Cardiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsPopulation Health Research InstituteMontreal Heart InstituteUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of TorontoWestern UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of OttawaMcGill UniversitySaint John Regional HospitalDalhousie UniversityQueen's UniversityMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchBritish Heart FoundationJewish General HospitalInstitut de Cardiologie de MontréalLondon Health Sciences CentreHamilton Health SciencesKingston General Hospital
KeywordsMedicinePercentileCoefficient of variationTroponinInternal medicineAcute coronary syndromeCardiologyExpert opinionTroponin IObservational studyMedical laboratoryClinical PracticeIntensive care medicinePathologyStatisticsFamily medicineMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multicentre prospective observational study (36 sites in 8 Canadian provinces), imbedded in the CODE-MI trial, had clinical laboratories at these sites test 3 samples (normal, female 99th-percentile, and male 99th-percentile concentrations) monthly for 1 year on 67 instruments, producing 2142 results from 6 distinct troponin assays. Mean differences varied per assay with maximum values being ± 4, ± 8, and ± 9 ng/L for the normal, female 99th-percentile, and male 99th-percentile sample, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.064
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.113
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.339
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0640.113
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2023
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of CardiologySame topicAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchFrench-language works237,207