MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4366767353

Retour à Sinope, ou l’appropriation d’une tradition inventée

2019· preprint· fr· W4366767353 on OpenAlexaff
Laurent Bricault

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAppropriationPhilosophySociologyEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Among the numerous hypotheses about the origins of the god Sarapis, the story of the negotiations that led its statue to leave the banks of the Black Sea for those of the Mediterranean is well known. The use that the civic authorities of Sinope made of it is perhaps less so. A study of the Sinopean coinage issued between the end of the 1st and the end of the 3rd century CE shows how the magistrates of the Paphlagonian city mobilized for their own profit a text of imperial legitimization to make it a new and major element of their civic identity by integrating a hitherto entirely foreign deity in the local pantheon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.025
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Same topicClassical Antiquity Studies→French-language works237,207→