Hierarchical and Distributed Eco-Driving Approach for Mixed Vehicle Clusters at Unsignalized Intersections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To improve the driving efficiency and energy-saving characteristics for large-scale mixed traffic flows under different market penetration rates (MPRs) of intelligent and connected vehicles (ICVs) at unsignalized intersections, considering the cooperative eco-driving performance between ICVs and human-driven vehicles (HDVs) with time-varying speed characteristics, the hierarchical and distributed cooperative eco-driving architecture is first established in this paper, consisting of a cloud decision layer and a vehicle control layer. For the cloud decision layer, the multivehicle model-free adaptive predictive cooperative driving (MFAPCD) method is designed by using only the driving data of the HDVs and ICVs formation based on compact form dynamic linearization (CFDL) technique, thereby improving traffic efficiency. Furthermore, the CFDL integral terminal sliding mode predictive control (CFDL-ITSMPC) scheme is utilized to predict the time-varying driving speed of HDVs, and then, the CFDL predictive control (CFDL-PC) scheme is utilized to predict the expected control variables of ICVs formation. For the vehicle control layer, based on the anticipated driving speed obtained from the cloud decision layer, the nonlinear distributed model predictive control (NDMPC) method is utilized for distributed optimal control of each vehicle formation, to achieve optimization in terms of energy saving. Simulation results show that, compared with the signal time assignment strategy, the method can increase the average velocity by about 15.22% and decrease the average fuel consumption by about 36.43% under different MPRs and traffic volumes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".