MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366771329 · doi:10.1002/eqe.3898

3D response simulation of a bridge with a posttensioned base rocking steel pier under sequential loading of traffic loads, braking force, and earthquake excitations

2023· article· en· W4366771329 on OpenAlex
Ahmad Rahmzadeh, M. Shahria Alam, Robert Tremblay

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPierStructural engineeringAbutmentEngineeringStiffnessGeotechnical engineeringSuperstructureDissipationFinite element methodBase (topology)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents finite element (FE) investigations of the seismic response of a bridge incorporating a base rocking steel pier. The pier consists of a circular steel tube, circular end plates, posttensioned (PT) tendon(s), and supplemental energy dissipation devices, and is configured to rock at its interface with the foundation. The main characteristic of such a pier is its ability to ensure small residual drifts after undergoing inelastic deformations during cyclic loading. The system has a tendency to close the gap due to the presence of superstructure dead load (DL) and tendon posttensioning force. Using experimental data, the calibration of the FE procedure is done at the material, component, and global system levels. The FE model of a prototype bridge is developed with the rocking pier modelled by continuum elements while superstructure, bearing units, abutment walls and backfill material modelled by discrete elements. The analysis procedure includes the application of one or two earthquake excitations, traffic loads, and braking force. The varied parameters are the diameter‐to‐thickness ratio of the column, presence of a PT tendon, addition of supplemental energy dissipaters (EDs), base plate dimensions, height of ED chairs, and ED strength. The results of dynamic FE studies demonstrate that a bridge utilizing such a pier has the potential to undergo consecutive earthquakes without sustaining significant damage and return to its original position without requiring abutment component stiffness and strength.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it