MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366777203 · doi:10.4043/32173-ms

Managing High Differential Pressures in Fractured Carbonate Reservoir by Use of Wellbore Strengthening Material

2023· article· en· W4366777203 on OpenAlexaff
Karl Ronny Klungtvedt, Jan Kristian Vasshus, Gunvald Nesheim, Paul D. Scott

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLost circulationDrilling fluidPetroleum engineeringDrillingCarbonateGeologyWellboreCompletion (oil and gas wells)Underbalanced drillingDifferential pressureGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The objective is to understand the impact of applying lost circulation materials preventatively to achieve strengthening of the wellbore when drilling fractured carbonate reservoirs. With a successful application, drilling with higher differential pressure can be enabled so that longer reservoir sections may be drilled, avoid splitting sections, and more remote parts of the reservoir may be reached. Having conducted extensive laboratory tests to evaluate the sealing strength, ease of mixing and circulation, resistance towards degradation, and the abrasivity (erosivity) of selected lost circulation materials, a novel loss prevention material (LPM) product was selected for application into multiple wells. A simple model was developed to predict the wellbore strengthening effect for a given concentration of the product in the fluid system. The product was thereafter applied preventatively for drilling slim-hole reservoir sections in deviated wells on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, where differential pressures were expected to be challenging. An LPM recovery system was used to maintain desired concentrations of LPM in the active system. Data were collected from the operations to provide a robust understanding of the ease of application and the functionality of the selected LPM material. Multiple fractured carbonate reservoirs were drilled under different pore-pressure conditions and with different drilling fluid densities. The results show that wells could be drilled without losses in conditions of around 2,400 psi overbalance, with product concentrations of less than half the maximum tested concentrations. Also, a field record of drilling a long horizontal reservoir section without tool failure was set, under conditions of unexpectedly high pore-pressures. The LPM recovery system proved to be successful with the novel materials, and very high rates of product retention was obtained, proving both the efficiency of the recovery plan and the material's resistance towards degradation. The field application highlights the potential for preventative treatment of the drilling fluid to achieve a strengthening of the wellbore and to integrate this with a simple method for estimating the fracture pressure of the formation at various levels of product concentrations. With this information in hand, both producer and injector wells can be planned for more optimal placements in the reservoir to enhance oil recovery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207