MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366777671 · doi:10.4043/32243-ms

SIIBED: Numerical Modeling of Subsea Pipelines and Cables in Ice Prone Region

2023· article· en· W4366777671 on OpenAlexaff
J. Barrett, Jin Chen, Nathan Cooke, Ryan Phillips, Kenton Pike

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsIntecsea (Canada)Centre For Cold Ocean Resources Engineering
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubseaPipeline transportFinite element methodMarine engineeringStructural engineeringPipeline (software)EngineeringLead (geology)Computer scienceMechanical engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The objective of this paper is to incorporate the outcomes of laboratory and physical testing carried out under the SIIBED program in order to develop, calibrate and validate a design tool for assessment of risk to subsea infrastructure due to ice keel interaction with pipelines, flexible flowlines, and electrical cables. This tool could then also be used to investigate load transfer to other subsea structures and facilities. A numerical modeling procedure is developed using the finite element analysis software Abaqus where the large deformation process of iceberg-pipe-soil interaction can be accommodated using the Coupled Eulerian Lagrangian (CEL) technique. The complexity of the ice-pipe-soil interaction is captured by appropriate and varied contact strategies in different areas of the model. Details of the model are discussed, including advancements of soil behavior and flexible flowline mechanical response, where it is desirable for the design tool to be optimized for computational efficiency while retaining reliable predictions of response. Case studies are presented for thick walled pipeline, flexible flowlines and electrical cables. Typically, the ice is modeled as a rigid body with unlimited strength. Limiting ice interaction forces, via pressure, is shown to have an effect on the displaced shape of the pipeline and flexible. Including radial compliance of the electrical cable is also shown to have an effect. With mesh refinement and retaining sufficient complexity in key areas, the complex model can be analyzed with a reasonable amount of computational cost. Advancements in the modeling of the ice feature strength limits are highlighted as well as application of large deformation modeling of electrical cables, which is atypical.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207