MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366778416 · doi:10.4043/32372-ms

SIIBED: An Updated Subsea Iceberg Risk Model for the Grand Banks

2023· article· en· W4366778416 on OpenAlexaff
Tony King, Ian Turnbull, Paul Stuckey

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsCentre For Cold Ocean Resources Engineering
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubseaIcebergSink (geography)Risk modelMarine engineeringOceanographyEngineeringGeologyRisk analysis (engineering)GeographyBusinessCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract As part of the SIIBED program, a subsea risk model for the Grand Banks was updated to reflect observed changes in the iceberg regime on the Grand Banks since the 1980s. This risk model is used to calculate interaction rates between free-floating and scouring icebergs and subsea infrastructure. The changes to the iceberg regime are described, along with the updates to the subsea risk model and changes in previously calculated iceberg interaction rates for a proposed facility. A methodology for integrating output from other SIIBED tasks into the risk analysis is outlined. Components of a source-to-sink model for understanding past changes in the iceberg regime, as well as future anticipated changes, are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207