MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366778454 · doi:10.4043/32322-ms

Wellbore Integrity During Production and Drilling Risk Analysis in Gas Hydrate Bearing Sediments by Coupled THMD Model

2023· article· en· W4366778454 on OpenAlexaff
Yarlong Wang, Yuan Yuan, Yutong Chai

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCabin pressurizationPetroleum engineeringPore water pressureHydrateDrillingWellboreDrilling fluidDeepwater drillingInstabilityGeotechnical engineeringGeologyMechanicsMaterials scienceChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Wellbore integrity in a gas hydrate bearing formation during drilling and production is a great challenge in the energy industry since a complex thermal-hydraulic-mechanical interaction with decomposed solid hydrate process is involved. A wellbore temperature increase and/or depressurization process may induce additional stresses and thermal and fluid flows, which may trigger wellbore instability, sand production, and undesired fracturing. Production-related wellbore integrity issues such as solid production during wellbore depressurization or heating are also widely observed and studied. To understand the thermal-hydraulic-mechanical behavior with hydrate decomposition (THMD) process and to simulate the THM responses of hydrate gas bearing sediments to wellbore pressure and temperature variations under a given in-situ stress regime during drilling and production, a fully coupled THMD model is presented in this paper. The conceptual THMD model with simplified semi-analytical solutions for the induced stress, pore pressure, and temperature at the wellbore and inside the formation is discussed. A linear Mohr-Coulomb criterion is utilized to define the onset of the wellbore instability or plastic yielding when sand production defined by effective plastic strain (EPS) is considered with a cohesion dependent on hydrate saturation. Numerical method with Laplace transformation is used to solve the transformed homogeneous PDE. We conclude that thermally- and hydration-induced stresses will affect wellbore integrity during hydrate gas production due to wellbore pressure reduction and temperature increase. Unlike the stress perturbation in the conventional gas reservoir, critical temperature and pressure for the equilibrium phase change must be surpassed to induce additional incremental stresses due to the hydrate decomposition. Additional fluid mass and energy transfer may take place with induced temperature and pore pressure because of the hydrate decomposition/recomposition. In addition, the hydrate saturation changes due to the typical drilling strategy applied may reduce the hydrate formation significantly, which will affect the design of production pressure control and management. Thus, pressure optimization is crucial for both maximum production and wellbore integrity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207