MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366778646 · doi:10.54097/hbem.v8i.7227

Changes in Crude Oil Price under the Russia-Ukraine Conflict and Dynamics of Stock Market in G7 Countries

2023· article· en· W4366778646 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wei Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueHighlights in Business Economics and Management · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStock (firearms)Crude oilStock marketBrent CrudeEconomicsOil priceAutoregressive conditional heteroskedasticityMonetary economicsFinancial economicsVolatility (finance)Geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On 24 February 2022, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, due to the war, caused the stock market with greater sensitivities to the change of crude oil prices. This paper studies the effect of crude oil on G7 countries’ stock markets before and after the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. Using a VAR model, impulse response plots are constructed to measure the extent of crude oil price impacts on stock prices in seven countries, and an ARMA-GRCH-X model is applied to measure the correlation between the prices of crude oil and stocks in seven countries. This study shows that variations in crude oil prices have the greatest influence on the stock markets of France, German, and Italy, with the UK following. The impact on the stock markets of Japan, Canada, and the US is relatively small. The results of the ARMA-GARCH-X model examination demonstrate that the prices of crude oil have a remarkable positive correlation with the stock markets of France, Germany, and Italy. This study shows that during the Russia-Ukraine conflict, stock markets were more influenced by the prices of crude oil and stock investors are advised to invest with caution during war.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHighlights in Business Economics and ManagementSame topicMarket Dynamics and VolatilityFrench-language works237,207