MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366780051 · doi:10.1353/tt.2023.0002

Working Backstage: A Cultural History and Ethnography of Technical Theater Labor by Christin Essin

2023· article· en· W4366780051 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David B. Vogel

Bibliographic record

VenueTheatre topics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVietnamese History and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnographySociologyCraftPrivilege (computing)Visual artsOral historyMedia studiesArtLawPolitical scienceAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Working Backstage: A Cultural History and Ethnography of Technical Theater Labor by Christin Essin David B. Vogel He/Him Working Backstage: A Cultural History and Ethnography of Technical Theater Labor. Christin Essin. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2021; pp. 273. In Working Backstage, Christin Essin writes passionately about the value and honor of the work done behind the scenes in theatrical productions. Coming from a background as a lighting technician in her college years, she brings first-hand experience to her research. She writes about the lives and careers of backstage workers who are at best ignored as superfluous and at worst maligned as underworked and overpaid union members. Working Backstage blends personal narratives from interviews with careful historical research to reveal the union stagehands, dressers, technicians, and childminders "whose labor fuels the city's live performance industry" (7), but who revel in their anonymity and invisibility to audiences. The book offers praise and encouragement to these skilled, dedicated, and hard-working technicians, while granting a deeper understanding of their work experiences. Essin structures the book so the reader can peruse what is most pertinent to their study, but I recommend reading straight through for the best experience. Part I describes the culture of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees (IATSE) and its variety of local unions across the US and Canada, then delivers interviews of New York City stagehands from within those locals. The author's strength lies in her insistence on going right to the source by directly interviewing workers, learning their unique stories, and weaving their narratives together into a clear picture of what backstage work is truly like. Essin demonstrates, through stories both personal and public, the value backstage workers add to the theatrical experience in the shifting of scenery or lighting, the management of heavily used costumes, or the care of children in a professional world—all this despite (and perhaps because of) remaining unseen by the audience. Part II takes a deep dive into histories of the stagehand unions, as seen from within and without. IATSE being as central to the working life of the New York City stagehand as it is, an uncensored history of the union can offer significant lessons from its past—if it is known. Essin takes on the question of what is included or omitted in the writing of a commemorative history as she considers an essay researched and published by IATSE's Local One (New York City) for their own centennial gala in 1986. Originally founded in 1886 as New York's Theatrical Protective Union, decades of struggle and internal conflicts transpired before it became the integrated and equity-minded organization it is in the twenty-first century. Essin documents how many of the more difficult parts of the union's history—racial and gender segregation, connections to crime syndicates—are left out of the anniversary history, which focuses instead on celebrating its successes and values. Essin takes the opportunity here to explore and share some of this missing material, including the fight to include African Americans as full and integrated members, as well as the decision to finally welcome women in the late twentieth century. Despite these struggles, Essin doggedly endorses the union's tireless work over more than a century to ensure a better quality of life—fair pay, reasonable hours, appropriate job security—for all its members. As she considers the union's role in the backstage worker's life and career, Essin addresses head-on the notion of union as "family," seen by some as nepotistic. She writes, "For outsiders, the union's traditional father-to-son professional inheritance denotes a history of systematic exclusion, especially for women or people of color" (90). But she goes on to describe how to many union members, "it is a history that bespeaks their devotion to family—those with whom they live … as well as those with whom they work" (91). An entire chapter in Part II is devoted to union stagehands and the media, considering their decades-long difficulty in getting anything but negative press. Essin writes, "Because unions only become 'newsworthy' when a strike looms or contract negotiations become ugly, the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0160.010
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheatre topicsSame topicVietnamese History and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207