MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366782899 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2023.0087

Discipline-Oriented Study Abroad: An Alternative Model to Current Business French Instruction

2023· article· en· W4366782899 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Steven J. Sacco

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCourseworkInternshipArgument (complex analysis)Business as usualFrenchStudy abroadMultidisciplinary approachPedagogySociologyMathematics educationManagementPolitical scienceHumanitiesPsychologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, the author describes discipline-oriented study abroad to develop globally ready students equipped with C1 proficiency and compares it with current Business French instruction. Discipline-oriented study abroad involves the study of business and engineering, in French, at business and engineering schools in France or Quebec. In this model, students complete a semester of coursework in French, followed by a semester-long internship with a French-speaking company. The author concludes by making the argument that the development of a multidisciplinary major or double major in French and Business is a potential strategy to protect endangered French programs in the U.S.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench reviewSame topicHigher Education Learning PracticesFrench-language works237,207