Credibility based chance constrained programming for parallel machine scheduling under linear deterioration and learning effects with considering setup times dependent on past sequences
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The industry has expressed significant concern regarding the issue of parallel machines and the influence of learning and deterioration. This research investigates non-identical parallel machine scheduling, taking into account the simultaneous consideration of learning effects, deterioration, and past-sequence-dependent setup times. Due to the existence of uncertain parameters in real-world scenarios, the processing times and due dates are assumed to be triangular fuzzy numbers. A fuzzy nonlinear mathematical model with two objective functions is presented and solved using the fuzzy Chance Constraint Programming approach. The two objectives are the summation of earliness and tardiness, as well as makespan. To achieve an efficient near-optimal Pareto front for the problem, a hybrid NSGA-II and VNS multi-objective meta-heuristic is proposed and the results are discussed. Finally, the augmented ε-constraint method is utilized to address issues with small dimensions. The computational analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of this proposed algorithm in tackling problems, especially those with substantial dimensions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it