MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366809283 · doi:10.1353/rss.2019.0010

“Invitation to Learning” Discusses A History of Western Philosophy

2019· article· en· W4366809283 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Irwin Edman, Horace Μ. Κallen, Harold A. Taylor, Lukas Spencer

Bibliographic record

VenueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPragmatism in Philosophy and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscription (linguistics)Library scienceComputer scienceLawPhilosophyPolitical scienceLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies n.s.  (summer ): – The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster U. issn –; online – Documents “INVITATION TO LEARNING” DISCUSSES A HISTORY OFWESTERN PHILOSOPHY Irwin Edman, Horace M. Kallen and Harold A. Taylor Introduced and transcribed by Lukas Spencer Russell Archives/Russell Research Centre / McMaster U. spencl2@mcmaster.ca ranscribed here is a  rpm vinyl (or possibly shellac) recording of the cbs broadcast of Invitation to Learning on  September . In it Irwin Edman, the chair, and guests Horace M. Kallen and Harold A. Taylor discuss Bertrand Russell’s recently published book, A History of Western Philosophy. The roughly thirty-minute broadcast, which aired on a Sunday from : to : pm, was segmented onto eight “vinyl” sides on four twelve-inch discs. They came with the fourth accrual of the Bertrand Russell Archives to McMaster University Library. “Transcription” holds quite a different meaning for a person who listens to a transcription than for a person who reads one. The image shows the “vinyl” recording in the Russell Archives which cbs may have sent to Russell himself sometime after the broadcast aired, or a friend or secretary may have requested it from the broadcaster. In radio broadcasting terms, a transcription is the product of a transcription disc recorder and is meant for subsidiary radio stations to play on their own airwaves. It was not necessarily meant for commercial use. The transcribing facility allowed the government -run us Armed Forces Network to broadcast domestic T  edman, kallen and taylor c:\users\ken\documents\type\rj   red.docx -- : AM radio shows in the uk and Europe during and after the Second World War. 1 In the image overleaf, the hand-printed “SET A” on the label, suggesting there was more than one set, may pertain to such distribution. In the National Archives of the United States, there are several transcriptions of Invitation to Learning sessions, but Russell seems not to have been a participant in them. Transcribing (into text, now) these Russell appearances on the programme— some dealing with topics not been found anywhere else in his known publications —would extend our understanding of Russell’s views.2 From here onward , “transcription” means speech converted to text. Whenever a speaker in the following discussion quotes A History of Western Philosophy directly, a page reference is noted. If the speaker misquotes Russell or if an extension of a pertinent quotation provides additional context for the discussion, the passage itself is provided. Other relevant publications by Russell are mentioned. Irwin Edman and Horace M. Kallen both published reviews in  of the History; where these reviews relate to their comments in the discussion, quotations are provided. In May  Columbia Broadcasting Systems began broadcasting Invitation to Learning weekly after a year of internal deliberation, successfully impelled by Stringfellow Barr, a cbs adult-education board member.3 The programme was broadcast almost exclusively on Sunday mornings or early afternoons.4 In addition to Barr, whom cbs asked to step down amid the first season, a revolving door of programme chairs presided during Invitation to Learning’s twenty-four-year history; the guests, two for each session, came in through an adjacent turnstile. Among the programme’s earliest regulars was none other than the esteemed educator himself, Bertrand Russell. Appearing on at least a dozen sessions between  and , Russell was among a short list of honoured guests whose own book was the programme’s focus of discussion. Before the session recording began, the chairman and guests convened for about an hour in a separate studio for a preliminary discussion of that session’s book. The only scripted part of the programme, save the announcer’s introductory and concluding statements, came from this pre-discussion huddle: the chair and guests would supply a representative quotation from the text which, of the three provided, the chair would choose whichever he thought was best and invite whoever suggested the quotation to read it aloud at the end of the programme (see Grams’ introduction). Given that Irwin Edman 1 For the technology, see Stirling, Encyclopedia of Radio (), : –, . 2 See Marley Beach, “‘Invitation to Learning’ Sessions”, p.  below. 3 Buffington, “Invitations to Learning” (), p. . 4 Grams, Invitation to Learning (), whose book...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.014
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell StudiesSame topicPragmatism in Philosophy and EducationFrench-language works237,207