MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366809304 · doi:10.1353/rss.2019.0014

“Invitation to Learning” Sessions

2019· article· en· W4366809304 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marley Beach

Bibliographic record

VenueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy, Science, and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt historyClassicsGeorge (robot)PhilosophyHistoryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies n.s.  (summer ):  The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster U. issn –; online – “INVITATION TO LEARNING” SESSIONS Marley Beach Russell Research Centre / McMaster U. beachm1@mcmaster.ca nvitation to Learning by Martin Grams, Jr. (Kearney, ne: otr / Morris Publishing , ) lists a dozen appearances by Bertrand Russell in –. Of these, the texts of seven have yet to be found. Searches of the archives belonging to the programme’s various hosts and participants have been fruitless, as well as the promising radio collection at the Library of Congress. The show was rebroadcast locally from “transcription discs”, and some may still lie in local radio station archives or await discovery in private collections. G. W. F. Hegel, Lectures on the Philosophy of History (). Speakers: Huntington Cairns, Mark Van Doren, Allen Tate and Russell.  April  (session #). Reprinted as Paper  in Papers . Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (–). Mark Van Doren and Russell.  September  (#). Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland (). Mark Van Doren, Katherine Anne Porter and Russell.  December  (#).  in Papers . Benedict de Spinoza, Ethics (). Scott Buchanan, Mark Van Doren and Russell.  January  (#).  in Papers . René Descartes, A Discourse on Method (). Jacques Barzun, Mark Van Doren and Russell.  April  (#).  in Papers . Ralph Waldo Emerson, English Traits (), and Washington Irving, The Sketchbook (). James Thurber and Russell.  October  (#). Boethius, The Consolations of Philosophy (). Irwin Edman, Ernest Nagel and Russell.  May  (#). George Bernard Shaw, Heartbreak House (). Lee Simonson, John Anderson and Russell.  June  (#). James Bryce, The American Commonwealth (). Max Lerner, Jacques Barzun and Russell.  July  (#). John Locke, Essay Concerning Human Understanding (). Lyman Bryson, Jacques Barzun and Russell.  September  (#). Walter Bagehot, The English Constitution (). Lyman Bryson, Lindsay Rogers and Russell.  March  (#). John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (). Lyman Bryson, Robert MacIver and Russell.  October  (#).  in Papers . I ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5990.402

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell StudiesSame topicPhilosophy, Science, and HistoryFrench-language works237,207