Bibliographic record
Abstract
russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies n.s. 37 (summer 2017): 255–64 The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster U. issn 0036–01631; online 1913–8032 c:\users\ken\documents\type3701\red\rj 3701 132 red.docx 2017-08-18 10:38 _ibliographies,Archival Inventories, Indexes BIBLIOGRAPHICAL INDEX TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF LEIBNIZ Kenneth Blackwell blackwk@mcmaster.ca lthough Russell included, in The Philosophy of Leibniz, a citation index to passages in the appendix, his general index excluded most of the references to Leibniz’s titled works and none to other works, and often their authors. This index completes the record of his sources, excluding only the frequently untitled fragments referred to by location in Gerhardt’s two editions. Bible: Genesis. Referred to: 68n. Boole, George. An Investigation of the Laws of Thought, on Which Are Founded the Mathematical Theories of Logic and Probabilities. London: Walton and Maberley, 1854. Referred to: 170. Boscovich, Rogerio Josepho [Bošković, Ruđer Josip]. Theoria Philosophiæ Naturalis. Venice: Typographia Remondiniana, 1763. (Russell’s Library, inscribed “B. Russell | June 1897”.) Referred to: 91n.2, 91n.3. Bradley, F. H. Appearance and Reality: a Metaphysical Essay. Oxford: Clarendon P., 1893; 2nd edn., 1897. (1st edn., Russell’s Library, inscribed “B. Russell | Trin. Coll. Camb. | May 1894.”) Referred to: 15n. (1st edn.). ——. The Principles of Logic. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, 1883. (1st edn., ex-Russell’s Library, inscribed “B. Russell | Trin. Coll. Camb. | June 1893.”) Referred to: 12n., 50n.1, 177. Caird, Edward. The Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Glasgow: James Maclehose and Sons, 1889. 2 vols. Referred to: 20n. ^= 256 kenneth blackwell c:\users\ken\documents\type3701\red\rj 3701 132 red.docx 2017-08-18 10:38 Chalmers, Thomas, et al. The Bridgewater Treatises: on the Power, Wisdom and Goodness of God as Manifested in the Creation. 8 vols. [9 with Babbage ’s vol.] London: 1833–38. Referred to: 183. Clerk Maxwell, James. Matter and Motion. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1888 (1st edn., 1876). Referred to: 83, 84n. Cohen, Hermann. Das Princip der Infinitesimal-Methode und seine Geschichte. Berlin: Dümmler, 1883. (Russell’s Library, inscribed “B. Russell | April 1898”.) Referred to: 88n., 109n.1, 111n.1. ms, fol. 171 (note at head); deleted on page proofs, 111n.2. Couturat, Louis. La Logique de Leibniz d’après des documents inédits. Paris: Alcan, 1901.1 (Russell’s Library, inscribed “A Monsieur B. Russell | Hommage de cordial sympathie. | Louis Couturat”.) Referred to: v, 171n. Descartes, René. “Méditations”: “Secondes Objections”. Oeuvres de Descartes . Victor Cousin, ed. Vol. 1. Paris: F. G. Levrault, 1824. (Russell’s Library.) Referred to: 173n.1. Dillmann, Eduard. Eine neue Darstellung der Leibnizischen Monadenlehre auf Grund der Quellen. Leipzig: O. R. Reisland, 1891. Referred to: xiii, 150n. Duncan, G. M. The Philosophical Works of Leibnitz. New Haven: Tuttle, Morehouse and Taylor, 1890. Referred to: xv, xxiii. Erdmann, Johann Eduard. Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie. 3rd edn. Zweiter Band, Philosophie der Neuzeit. Berlin: Verlag von Wilhelm Hertz, 1878. (Russell’s Library, vol. 2 inscribed “B. Russell”.) Referred to: 145n.2, 188 (“Geschichte, Vol. ii. 2, p. 62”); 151n.1 in page proofs (sec. iii in textual notes). ——. Leibnitz und die Entwicklung des Idealismus vor Kant dargestellt. Vol. 4, Part 2, of Versuch einer wissenschaftlichen Darstellung der Geschichte der neuern Philosophie. Leipzig: Vogel, 1842. Referred to: xiii (“his larger history”), 147 (“supported by Erdmann” [Geschichte ?]), 154 (“theory … of Erdmann” [Geschichte ?]); MS, fol. 232 (“Hist. pp. XL, 98”; deleted, PL, 151: 13), 281 (deleted in page proofs, PL, 186: 26). ——, ed. G. W. Leibniz. Opera Philosophica. Berlin: G. Eichler, 1840. (Russell ’s Library.) 1 Russell spelled Leibniz’s name “Leibnitz” and dated the book’s publication as 1900. Bibliographical Index to The Philosophy of Leibniz 257 c:\users\ken\documents\type3701\red\rj 3701 132 red.docx 2017-08-18 10:38 c:\users\ken\documents\type3701\red\rj 3701 132 red.docx 2017-08-18 10:38 Referred to: xiii, 2, 109n.3; MS, fol. 232 (“Erdmann p. 453”; page proofs, 151n. as “Geschichte”; deleted, PL, 151: 13). Fischer, Kuno. Geschichte der neuern Philosophie [History of Modern Philosophie]. Stuttgart-Mannheim-Heidelberg: Friedrich Bassermann, 1854–77, and later edns. Referred to: 147...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.027 | 0.063 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.368 | 0.294 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".