Bibliographic record
Abstract
he edition of New Hopes for a Changing World indexed here was pub-Tl ished by George Allen and Unwin in London in .The pagination for Simon and Schuster's edition (New York, ) is very similar.Subtract about from the page numbers below to find references in the American edition.The present index is the sixth in a series of indexes that began with a name index to The Foundations of Geometry () in Russell, no. (), another to Human Society in Ethics and Politics () in n.s. (), and the present indexer's full indexes to Portraits from Memory in (), Fact and Fiction in (), and Authority and the Individual in ().-Ed.academies, for exceptional individuals - adultery , , adventure -, see also risk-taking aeroplanes affection for children , Africa , birth-control in North Africa made desert , population , , -, , suspicion of white imperialism - Western expenditure required aggression dealing with - impulses of , -, - see also hostility; racial hostility agriculture effect on soil , in human progress -, , - and industrialism - international authority land-availability and population - productivity in -, , aid, international , Albigenses Alexander the Great Alps , altruism in economic relations Amazon America and civil war in Russia
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.264 | 0.096 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".