MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366809627 · doi:10.1353/rss.2000.0015

The CCNY Affair

2000· article· en· W4366809627 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Louis Greenspan

Bibliographic record

VenueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicProperty Rights and Legal Doctrine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattleSkepticismLawSpanish Civil WarSociologyPolitical scienceClassicsPhilosophyHistoryEpistemologyAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

,%views THE CCNY AFFAIR LOUIS GREENSPAN Religious Studies / McMaster U. Hamilton, ON, Canada L8s 4K1 GREENSPN@MCMASTER.CA Thorn Weidlich. Appointment Denied: the Inquisition of Bertrand Russell. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 2000. Pp. 233 + 8 (illus.). US$25.00. W hen the Board of Higher Education of the City of New York voted, in· February 1940, to offer Bertrand Russell a position as professor of philosophy at the City College of New York, they had no forewarning that their decision would touch off a cultural war as ferocious and divisive as any that we have experienced in recent decades. But unlike contemporary cultural wars, the CCNY dispute lasted only a few short months. It fizzled out because Russell's supporters were unwilling to commit themselves to an extended battle in the courts, and, Russell, needing an income, quietly accepted another position. The concerns that the cultural war raised were rapidly overshadowed by the military war that was taking place in Europe for, as the CCNY affair was ending, the Battle of Britain began. The controversy was never resurrected because it didn't seem to raise any issues of permanent importance. The charges that had been brought against Russell-that he was sceptical concerning the philosophical validity of any absolute moral claims, that he believed that young men and women should be able to live together outside the framework of marriage, that adultery should not be taken so seriously as to be the most solemnly recognized basis for divorce, and, in his wilder moments, that homosexuality should not be a criminal offence-. would hardly shake the moral foundations of any existing liberal democracy. In today's world of single mothers, sexual partnerships, Gay Pride and President Clinton's exegesis of what constitutes sexual relations, the storm over Russell's proposals seems as quaint as the Victorian debates over whether trains that were travelling over twelve miles an hour were breaking boundaries established by God. The CCNY affair is mainly remembered as a comedy. Its most celebrated document is attorney Joseph Goldstein's oft-repeated, colourful charge sheet which denounced Russell as "lecherous, libidinous, lustful , aphrodisiac, irreverent" and on and on-a document that Russell repeated with glee, boasting that his only predecessors were Apuleius and Othello. russell: the Journal of Bemand Russell Smdies The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster U. n.s. 2.0 (summer 2.000): 71-92. ISSN 0036-0163l 72 Reviews Thorn Weidlich's Appointment Denied restores the episode to its proper place in Russell's life, in the history of academic freedom and, indeed, in the intellectual history of our times. He argues that the affair was not trivial and certainly not comic, and that it opened issues that remain unresolved. On 26 February 1940, New York's Board of Higher Education approved the appointment of Bertrand Russell almost without discussion. It was one item in a full agenda of a liberal body that was meant to have an arm's length relationship to the government that had brought it into existence. Russell's appointment was so routine and without controversy that he was prepared to give up a position that he already held at UCLA (to the delight of the President of that institution). On I March, Bishop Manning, spiritual leader of the city's Episcopalian community, sent a letter to the press in which he announced his outrage at the decision, and included direct quotations from Russell's writings that he felt certain would arouse any New Yorker concerned about the moral rectitude of the city. His letter created an immediate sensation. It called into existence a coalition consisting of the Hearst press and the various Catholic associations of the city. The latter were mobilized into a high state of militancy . Even police and associations of war veterans were addressed, with warnings that Russell's moral endorsement of adultery would produce an epidemic of jealous, murderous male violence. As the pressure mounted, Board members were thrown into confusion and dismay. Many demanded that the appointment be reconsidered. On 18 March the Board met, again behind closed doors. But this time the corridors were invaded by over 200 observers. In a scene reminiscent of the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell StudiesSame topicProperty Rights and Legal DoctrineFrench-language works237,207