MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366809650 · doi:10.1353/rss.2016.0010

Russell Needed to Write

2016· article· en· W4366809650 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Peter Stone

Bibliographic record

VenueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy, Science, and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGriffinClassicsPoliticsPhilosophyArt historyHistoryLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies n.s. 36 (summer 2016): 92–4 The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster U. issn 0036–01631; online 1913–8032 c:\users\ken\documents\type3601\red\rj 3601 077 red.docx 2016-04-01 10:08 oeviews RUSSELL NEEDED TO WRITE Peter Stone Political Science / Trinity College Dublin 2, Ireland pstone@tcd.ie Nicholas Griffin, ed. A Pacifist atWar: Letters andWritings of Bertrand Russell, 1914–1918. Nottingham: Spokesman, 2014. Pp. 218. isbn: 978 0 85124 837 0.£9.99 (pb). f there was one thing that Bertrand Russell knew, it was how to write letters. Over the course of his long life, he produced tens of thousands of letters. Many of those are lost forever, but a huge number of them have survived. These letters make good reading, at least for Russell scholars, and so it is not surprising that there are many anthologies of these letters out there. These include the two-volume Selected Letters, edited by Nicholas Griffin (1992– 2001), which covers the whole of Russell’s life and thought, as well as more focused collections, such as Dear Russell—Dear Jourdain, edited by Ivor Grattan -Guinness (1977), and Russell’s Correspondance  avec Louis Couturat (1897–1913), edited by A.-F. Schmid (2 vols., 2001).There is even a collection of Russell’s correspondence with the press—Yours Faithfully, Bertrand Russell, ably edited by Ray Perkins, Jr. (2001)—and one of his correspondence with the general public—Dear Bertrand Russell, edited by Barry Feinberg and Ronald Kasrils (1969). Indeed, at this point there are so many anthologies of Russell correspondence that whenever a new one appears, even the hardcore Russellian must ask, why another one? I found myself asking this question while reading A Pacifist atWar, the latest anthology of Russell letters.This volume (also edited by Nicholas Griffin) collects highlights from Russell’s correspondence in the period 1914–18. I enjoyed reading the collection immensely, and yet the question whether the collection was needed nagged at my mind the entire time. To be sure, the volume contains no surprises in terms of content. All of the letters it contains were first published in Volume 2 of Griffin’s Selected Letters. In re-editing the collection for publication here, Griffin took the opportunity to correct some small errors and supply additional information about the letters (p. 4). He also provides a very well written and readable introduction, f= Reviews 93 c:\users\ken\documents\type3601\red\rj 3601 077 red.docx 2016-04-01 10:08 marred only by a rather abrupt ending (p. 12). And he appends to the letters a half-dozen short anti-war pieces by Russell, including his appeal toWoodrow Wilson and the article that earned him a six-month prison sentence. (While these articles form a separate section of the book, the section is effectively an appendix to the letters.) Griffin’s excellent introduction is badly needed. The letters are certainly not self-explanatory.They require a lot of context to appreciate properly. Grif- fin supplies much of the context, through both the introduction and the extensive explanatory notes embedded in the text (notes that sometimes run longer than the letters they explain).This makes the letters much better reading ; still, one frequently gets the feeling that something is missing. Perhaps this is unavoidable given the absence of letters from Russell’s correspondents. Moreover, there are gaps with respect even to Russell’s own letters.These gaps are not Griffin’s fault; there are many letters that a Russell scholar would love to read but that are almost certainly lost and gone forever.This is particularly true of Russell’s letters to D. H. Lawrence during their brief and disastrous political collaboration; not a single one of these letters survives (p. 45 n.1). As the book’s title implies, the most important topic covered by the letters is Russell’s crusade againstWorldWar i. But the letters do not focus upon this topic, nor indeed upon any topic; they simply chronicle Russell’s life during the period in which World War i takes place. Obviously, such a chronicle will wind up spending much time...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0130.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0910.051

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell StudiesSame topicPhilosophy, Science, and HistoryFrench-language works237,207