MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366809736 · doi:10.1353/rss.2000.0018

Russell the Political Theorist

2000· article· en· W4366809736 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Peter Stone

Bibliographic record

VenueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIndian History and Philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsPolitical philosophyCoachingOrder (exchange)EpistemologySocial scienceSociologyClassicsPolitical scienceHistoryLawPhilosophyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviews 85 RUSSELL THE POLITICAL THEORIST PETER STONE Political Science / U. of Rochester Rochester, NY 14627, USA PRSE@TROI.CC.ROCHESTER.EDU Bart Schultz, ed. "The Social and Political Philosophy of Bertrand Russell", Parts 1-2. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 26 Gune, Sept. 1996): 157-266, 317-68. US$30 (the 2-issue set). Talent requires training in order to produce consistent strong performance . Indeed, without training of some sort, talent may not count for much. Michael Jordan might well have played basketball better than anyone else in history. Had he received no training or coaching at all, however, I 86 Reviews doubt that his extraordinary natural ability would have proven a match for the highly developed skills of even a mediocre NBA player. He might have excelled, but more likely there would have been a lot of variance, flashes of brilliant play surrounded by much that was commonplace, with an abundance of truly abysmal mistakes. Interestingly enough, this description also fits Bertrand Russell's career as a political theorist, and with good reason. The recent two-part symposium in Philosophy ofthe Social Sciences on "The Social and Political Philosophy of Bertrand Russell" demonstrates this fact. The contributors to this valuable symposium-an august group of philosophers and political scientists, several of whom are noted for previous work in Russell studies-address a varIety of issues relating to Russell's political theory and practice. Together, they paint a picture of a wildly intelligent and passionately concerned thinker who lacked the training for first-rate political thought. Russell, in short, could have used a good coach in political theory. Training, of course, is not an end in itself; possession of a doctorate in political theory is neither necessary nor sufficient for good work in the field. Rather, training has value because of what it imparts. Political theory, like most other human endeavours,I benefits from careful reflection on the nature of the activity, with an eye to eliminating mistakes and improving performance . In basketball, players study techniques leading to better dribbling, passing, and shooting; in political theory, practitioners consider the warrant for the various parts of the normative arguments they advance. In both cases, of course, the development of skill usually requires some sort of coach; no man is an island, and both political theorists and' basketball players need mentors to train them. But the best players and political theorists become "self-coaching", able to engage in critical reflection on their own work which will lead to improvements in the long run. Not everyone can become a Michael Jordan or a John Rawls, but virtually any player in any "sport" can do better through practice, provided that practice is accompanied by reflection as to what needs improvement. Over the course of his long life, Russell reflected upon and wrote about many topics, including mathematics, philosophy, and social and political affairs. He attacked the first two with a passion for precision, permitting neither himself nor others any sloppiness or lack of rigour. But despite an engagement with political affairs that lasted approximately 75 years,2 Russell I For a sustained defence of this conception of human activity, one that explicitly relies on the analogy with playing and coaching in sportS, see Eugene Meehan, The Thinking Game: a Guide to Effective Study (Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House, 1988). 2 I take Russell's interventions in politics to stare with the publication of his book German Social Democracy in 1896, and to end only with his death in 1970. 'Reviews 87 never gave political issues the sort of careful attention and painstaking analysis he devoted to epistemology, metaphysics, and mathematics. In short, he never became a self-coaching political theorist; and his work reflected this fact.3 Many people have noted this gap between Russell's technical philosophy and his political theory. Bart Schultz, the editor of the symposium (and one of the few political scientists not to ignore Russell), wrote in his introduction, "It is difficult ... to fit Russell together as a whole, to bring the life, the ethics, and the politics into easy relation with the analytic philosophy" (p. 158). Russell himself, however, would probably not have found this lack of...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell StudiesSame topicIndian History and PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207