Reconstructing the Logical Construction of the World

January 25, 2012 (9:31 am) E:\CPBR\RUSSJOUR\TYPE3102\russell 31,2 064 red.wpd russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies n.s. 31 (winter 2011–12): 188–90 The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster U. issn 0036-01631; online 1913-8032 eviews RECONSTRUCTING THE LOGICAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE WORLD Graham Stevens Philosophy / U. of Manchester Manchester m13 9pl, uk graham.p.stevens@manchester.ac.uk Omar W. Nasim. Foreword by Michael Beaney. Bertrand Russell and the Edwardian Philosophers: Constructing the World. (Series: History of Analytic Philosophy .) Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. £50; us$89. Pp. xiii, 208. Hardcover : isbn-13: 978-0-230-20579-6. isbn-10: 0230205798. R ussell’s method of logical construction, whereby ontological commitment to certain metaphysically objectionableentitiesmaybewithheldbydemonstrating that they can be constructed from simpler elements whose ontological status is less objectionable, is often viewed as the most important doctrine of his philosophy. The most famous instance of the method was, of course, the 1905 theory of deWnite descriptions. In Principia Mathematica, the theory of descriptions is appealed to as the model on which the logical construction of classes is based. Thus the method provides Russell with the means for his proposed solution to the paradoxes and, thus, for the foundation of mathematics. Discussion of this aspect of Russell’s philosophy has often studied it in isolation from the philosophical context in which Russell was working. Mathematical inXuences on Russell have often been noted, such as Frege and Dedekind, but philosophical ones have seldom been noted. This has led to a rather ahistorical picture of Russell’s development. Nasim’s book exposes the inaccuracy of that picture with an exemplary historical examination of Russell’s immediate philosophical surroundings during the period in which he produced much of his most important work on logical constructions. The result is a fascinating reappraisal of Russell’s motivations and inXuences that signiWcantlyadvancesourunderstanding ofRussell ’s philosophy. The key event that Nasim identiWes as a crucial force motivating Russell’s work is an extended debate (Nasim grandly dubs it “the Controversy”) conducted by several British philosophers between 1900 and 1916. Apart from Russell and Moore, the protagonists in this debate are seldom read nowadays. At the January 25, 2012 (9:31 am) E:\CPBR\RUSSJOUR\TYPE3102\russell 31,2 064 red.wpd Reviews 189 time, however, they were at the forefront of British philosophy. The other key Wgures in question were G.yF. Stout, Samuel Alexander, T.yP. Nunn, and G. Dawes Hicks. The Controversy surrounded the epistemological problem of the external world and our relation to it. It was this debate, Nasim suggests, which provided the impetus for much of Russell’s thinking about logical constructions and, in particular, for his application of the method to the philosophy of perception . If Nasim is right, then without the Controversy, Russell may not have developedhisdistinctiveepistemologythat distinguished knowledge by acquaintance from knowledge by description and which was so inXuential. Twentiethcentury philosophy, in other words, may have been very diTerent if it were not for the Controversy. Aside from throwing new light on Russell’s philosophical development, Nasim ’s book also illuminates an interesting period in British philosophy that is rarely studied in such depth. The impact of Russell, Moore, and Wittgenstein on subsequent generations has encouraged a tendency to treat the history of British philosophy in this period as the history merely of these three. Nasim’s book serves as a reminder that there were many other Wgures that were as, if not more, prominent at the time. History may have made the correct judgment about the merits of those Wgures it has subsequently overlooked, but the fact remains that ignoring the contemporaries of those, like Russell, who we are still in process of learning from, can only hinder our understanding. This is shown admirably by Nasim in the way that he carefully reconnects Russell’s notion of sense-data with the Controversy. Having explicated the details of the Controversy and the individual contributions made to it by Stout, Nunn, Alexander and Cook Wilson in the Wrst three chapters, Nasim then contextualizes Russell’s notion of sense-date in relation to these in Chapter 4. The importance of the Controversy for Russell...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.