Entropy optimization in squeezed nanofluidic dissipative transport of radiative water conveying aluminum alloys
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, squeezing transport of radiative water conveying aluminum alloys (i.e., AA7072 and AA7075) mobilized by entropy generation and dissipative energy is analyzed. Problem is formulated in a rotating frame with the consideration of magnetohydrodynamics and Joule heating aspects. Maxwell model for nanofluid has been used to incorporate the thermophysical properties of nanoelements. Formulated governing expressions have been transformed into system of ODEs by introducing similarity variables. The transformed system of ODEs is then numerically solved by Runge–Kutta–Fehlberg (RKF) method based on shooting background. The physical quantities (i.e., skin-friction coefficient, Nusselt and Bejan numbers) of scientific interest are formulated and illustrated via various plots. Graphical representations of squeezing function, temperature profile and velocity profile have been made to examine the effects of involved parameters. Streamlines and isotherms patterns have been formed and discussed. To authenticate the validity of model, skin-friction values have been compared with published literature for limited version of the model. Entropy and temperature of the system are improved with the involvement of aluminum alloys in water. Symmetrical behavior of streamlines is observed for positive approach of squeezing parameter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it