MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366813847 · doi:10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100359

Recent developments in phase change material-based solar water heating systems: Insights on research trends and opportunities

2023· article· en· W4366813847 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Thermofluids · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Change Materials Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersSistema Nacional de InvestigadoresSecretaria Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaSecretaría Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación
KeywordsPhase changePhase (matter)Environmental scienceEngineering physicsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerous researchers have proposed phase change materials (PCMs) as an alternative for increasing the autonomy of solar water heaters (SWHs). Many studies have considered SWHs with PCMs in three main configurations: PCMs inside the solar thermal collector, inside a coupled heat storage unit, and within the water storage tank. A wide range of topics has been explored within studies assessing SWHs with PCMs in recent years, including but not limited to enhancement techniques for improving heat transfer, optimization strategies, economic factors, weather exposure on performance, and the application of design methodologies. This article reviews and discusses recent work on these trending topics, identifies research opportunities, and suggests promising research efforts toward more mature SWHs with PCM technology, focusing on long-term performance, scalability, economic, and technical feasibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.283
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.121 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it