Vers une meilleure compréhension de la motivation scolaire chez les élèves de centres de la formation professionnelle : l’importance du rôle du climat relationnel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En prenant appui sur la théorie de l’autodétermination, cette étude examine l’importance du climat relationnel d’après la perception des élèves de centres de la formation professionnelle et de son rôle sur la motivation scolaire de ces derniers. Deux importants facteurs du climat relationnel ont fait l’objet d’une étude plus approfondie, soit la perception de la qualité des relations interpersonnelles (QRI) des élèves envers leurs enseignant·es ainsi que la perception de la confiance et de la méfiance relationnelles des élèves envers leurs enseignant·es. L’échantillon était composé de 908 élèves réparti·es parmi 22 centres de la formation professionnelle du Québec. Les résultats des analyses ont révélé que la confiance et la méfiance relationnelles jouent un rôle médiateur entre la QRI et la motivation des élèves, soulignant le caractère essentiel de relations interpersonnelles de qualité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".