MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366823064 · doi:10.1134/s0016702923060071

Granophyre Norites and Diorites of the Jarva-Varaka Massif (Monchegorsk Ore Area, Kola Region, Russia): Geology, Petrography, Geochemistry, Geochronology and Origin

2023· article· en· W4366823064 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
L. I. Nerovich, Т. В. Каулина, T. B. Bayanova, В.Л. Ильченко, M. A. Gannibal, E. L. Kunakkuzin, Ayya V. Bazai, С. В. Мудрук, E. S. Borisenko, M. A. Sosnovskaya

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry International · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryMassifFelsicMaficDioriteGneissPorphyriticAnorthositeHornfelsGreenschistPetrologyPlagioclaseMetamorphismBiotiteQuartzZirconMetamorphic rock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The results of geological, geochemical, and geochronological studies of granophyre rocks from the Jarva-Varaka Massif (Kola region) are presented. The 2-km section of the massif is composed of mafic and felsic norites, hypersthene diorite, pigeonite-augitic diorite, quartz diorite, and granodiorite. All these rocks contain a variable amount of granophyre (micropegmatite), from ~10% in norites that compose the lower part of the massif, to ~45% in quartz diorite and granodiorite of the upper part. The Sudbury Igneous Complex (SIC) is the only known case of a similar 2-km thick section of granophyre rocks whose composition varies from mafic at the bottom to felsic at the top. The SIC has an impact origin, which suggests a similar formation mechanism for the Jarva-Varaka Massif. The norites contain micro-xenoliths of the host high-alumina gneisses, which were transformed to rocks of the high-grade hornfels facies. Such gneisses are absent among the country rocks of other mafic intrusions in the area, and it suggests that the parental melt for mafic norites could have assimilated the host rocks. Given the relatively small size of the massif, the formation of hornfelses could have occurred if the xenoliths would be entrained by a melt under near-surface conditions, and the melt was hot enough to cause the formation of hornfelses. Spinifex-like structures in the diorites of the very marginal contact zone of the Jarva-Varaka Massif indicate very rapid cooling of a high-temperature melt, which is typical of near-surface conditions. A pseudotachylitic breccia, planar deformations in quartz, kink-bands in biotite and clinozoisite, zircon and inclusions of sillimanite and plagioclase all transformed into diaplectic glasses detected in the host rocks of the Jarva-Varaka Massif are interpreted as distinct signs of shock metamorphism. Geophysical data show no signs that beneath the Jarva-Varaka Massif there exists a large mafic intrusion that could have contaminated large volumes of crustal material, and magmatic differentiation of which could have produced a large volume of enriched melt whose crystallization could resulted in the formation of granophyre rocks from the bottom to the top of the magma chamber. All of the aforementioned data indicate that the impact origin of the 2.5 Ga Jarva-Varaka Massif is very likely.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochemistry InternationalSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207