Environmental Concerns in Andrea James' Yanagai! Yanagai! and Drew Taylor's The Berlin Blues: An Eco-Critical Perspective.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Within the initiative taken by Cheryll Glotfelty, the new discipline and theory known as ecocriticism came into existence. Ecocriticism explores the relationship of literature with the natural world and further examines the role the environment and the natural surroundings play in the minds of writers during the creative process. The present paper aims to examine two plays from the Australian and Canadian works of literature; the first play is Yanagai! Yanagai! (2003) by Andrea James, while the other is The Berlin Blues (2008) by Drew Taylor. In these two plays, James and Taylor reveal colonization’s effects and assert that Eurocentric ideology is based upon making the occupied lands subordinate to the colonizer’s powerful hegemony. The prevailing conception is that the colonization of Aboriginal Australia was about controlling their land, the real treasure. Aboriginal Australian and Canadian playwrights have portrayed the environmental degradation of their lands at the hands of White settlers. In this paper, the interest in revealing environmental degradation has been dramatized by playwrights, whose plays incisively reveal the extreme danger of such an ecological crisis in the past, present and future. ظهرت نظرية النقد البيئي ضمن المبادرة التي اتخذتها شيريل غلوتفيلتي. ويحاول النقد البيئي استكشاف علاقة الأدب بالعالم الطبيعي والبيئة المحيطة. ويدرس كذلك الدور الذي تلعبه البيئة المحيطة في افكار الكتاب المبدعين أثناء كتابة الأعمال الابداعية. تهدف هذه الورقة البحثية إلى دراسة مسرحيتين من الأعمال الأدبية الأسترالية والكندية. المسرحية الأولى هي ياناغاي! ياناغاي! (2003) لأندريا جيمس، والآخرى هى مسرحية برلين بلوز (2008) لدرو تايلور. في هاتين المسرحيتين، تمكن جيمس وتايلور من الكشف عن آثار الاستعمار على البيئة مؤكدَين أن الأيديولوجية الأوروبية المركزية تقوم على جعل الأراضي المحتلة خاضعة لهيمنة المستعمر. المفهوم السائد هو أن "استعمار السكان الأصليين في أستراليا كان يتعلق بالسيطرة على الأرض، والثروة الحقيقية للسكان الأصليين في جميع أنحاء العالم. وقد صور الكتاب المسرحيون الأستراليون والكنديون الأصليون التدهور البيئي لأراضيهم على أيدي المستوطنين البيض. في هذه الورقة البحثية، تم تصوير الاهتمام بالكشف عن التدهور البيئي من قبل الكتاب المسرحيين، الذين تكشف مسرحياتهم بشكل قاطع عن الخطر الشديد لمثل هذه الأزمة البيئية في الماضي والحاضر والمستقبل.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".