MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366832578 · doi:10.21608/jwadi.2023.295135

Environmental Concerns in Andrea James' Yanagai! Yanagai! and Drew Taylor's The Berlin Blues: An Eco-Critical Perspective.

2023· article· ar· W4366832578 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shaimaa Mohamed Hassanin

Bibliographic record

Venueمجلة وادي النيل للدراسات والبحوث الإنسانية والاجتماعية والتربويه · 2023
Typearticle
Languagear
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBluesPerspective (graphical)Environmental ethicsHistorySociologyArt historyArtPhilosophyVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Within the initiative taken by Cheryll Glotfelty, the new discipline and theory known as ecocriticism came into existence. Ecocriticism explores the relationship of literature with the natural world and further examines the role the environment and the natural surroundings play in the minds of writers during the creative process. The present paper aims to examine two plays from the Australian and Canadian works of literature; the first play is Yanagai! Yanagai! (2003) by Andrea James, while the other is The Berlin Blues (2008) by Drew Taylor. In these two plays, James and Taylor reveal colonization’s effects and assert that Eurocentric ideology is based upon making the occupied lands subordinate to the colonizer’s powerful hegemony. The prevailing conception is that the colonization of Aboriginal Australia was about controlling their land, the real treasure. Aboriginal Australian and Canadian playwrights have portrayed the environmental degradation of their lands at the hands of White settlers. In this paper, the interest in revealing environmental degradation has been dramatized by playwrights, whose plays incisively reveal the extreme danger of such an ecological crisis in the past, present and future. ظهرت نظرية النقد البيئي ضمن المبادرة التي اتخذتها شيريل غلوتفيلتي. ويحاول النقد البيئي استكشاف علاقة الأدب بالعالم الطبيعي والبيئة المحيطة. ويدرس كذلك الدور الذي تلعبه البيئة المحيطة في افكار الكتاب المبدعين أثناء كتابة الأعمال الابداعية. تهدف هذه الورقة البحثية إلى دراسة مسرحيتين من الأعمال الأدبية الأسترالية والكندية. المسرحية الأولى هي ياناغاي! ياناغاي! (2003) لأندريا جيمس، والآخرى هى مسرحية برلين بلوز (2008) لدرو تايلور. في هاتين المسرحيتين، تمكن جيمس وتايلور من الكشف عن آثار الاستعمار على البيئة مؤكدَين أن الأيديولوجية الأوروبية المركزية تقوم على جعل الأراضي المحتلة خاضعة لهيمنة المستعمر. المفهوم السائد هو أن "استعمار السكان الأصليين في أستراليا كان يتعلق بالسيطرة على الأرض، والثروة الحقيقية للسكان الأصليين في جميع أنحاء العالم. وقد صور الكتاب المسرحيون الأستراليون والكنديون الأصليون التدهور البيئي لأراضيهم على أيدي المستوطنين البيض. في هذه الورقة البحثية، تم تصوير الاهتمام بالكشف عن التدهور البيئي من قبل الكتاب المسرحيين، الذين تكشف مسرحياتهم بشكل قاطع عن الخطر الشديد لمثل هذه الأزمة البيئية في الماضي والحاضر والمستقبل.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0260.023
Scholarly communication0.0120.006
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0060.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueمجلة وادي النيل للدراسات والبحوث الإنسانية والاجتماعية والتربويهSame topicEcocriticism and Environmental LiteratureFrench-language works237,207