MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366833336 · doi:10.33423/jlae.v20i1.6002

Corruption in Bangladesh: Background Causes and Current Scenario

2023· article· en· W4366833336 on OpenAlexfundno aff
N N Tarun Chakravorty

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Leadership Accountability and Ethics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of BathMcGill University
KeywordsExpropriationLanguage changeConsolidation (business)CapitalismDevelopment economicsNorm (philosophy)State (computer science)Public sectorEconomicsPolitical scienceBusinessPolitical economyMarket economyEconomyLawFinancePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While Bangladesh is characterized by impressive rates of economic growth and significant improvement in several development indicators, it is also marked by high levels of corruption. This study engages with bribery to show that it has become a norm in transactions, which has made it a systemic part of the Bangladeshi economy. It argues that the state-sanctioned involvement of untrained individuals such as ruling party members and freedom fighters in running the state machinery is a significant factor for the genesis and consolidation of corruption in Bangladesh from 1972 to 2013. The introduction of such candidates into the civil service, public sector enterprises has led to the expropriation by a few leading to the development of crony capitalism in the country. Furthermore, it posits Bangladesh as a key site for the illustration of speed money theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.227
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.120 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Leadership Accountability and EthicsSame topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207