Dimmons Research Group Strategic Planning 2018-2023
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Created in January 2016, Dimmons.net is one of the ten research groups of the Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3), a research center of the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC). Dimmons group research focuses on socio economic innovation connected to digital technologies, and more concretely, on the collaborative economy and the Commons. This is a report of the strategic planning process of Dimmons, which has been developed adopting a co-designed approach. Involving the diversity of its group’s members and network of close collaborators, as well as other representative stakeholders, the goal has been to establish the strategic objectives for the research group from 2018 to 2023. This strategic planning of Dimmons follows the previous strategic planning of the IN3 and the UOC in 2016. Related publication: Senabre Hidalgo, E., & Fuster Morell, M. (2019). Co-designed strategic planning and agile project management in academia: Case study of an action research group. <em>Palgrave Communications</em>, 5(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0364-0
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.027 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".