MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366976407 · doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.594.2.6

Typification and taxonomy of Echinophora scabra (Echinophoreae, Apioideae)

2023· article· en· W4366976407 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Khajehpiri, Hojjatollah Saeidi, Catherine La Farge, Farrokh Ghahremaninejad

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytotaxa · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical synthesis and alkaloids
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSepalIndumentumBiologyBotanyPetalPedicelEudicotsTaxonomy (biology)HerbariumTypificationNomenclaturePollenStamen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Echinophora scabra (Apiaceae) is one of the endemic species to the Iranica plateau with limited distribution range in Afghanistan and Pakistan which is the most eastern edge of the genus existence and penetration. In addition to its geographic distribution, morphologic, anatomic and micromorphologic characters of the plant, especially its umbellulas and mericarps features, make this species a remarkable candidate for further studies. Some of the most important and taxonomically valuable characters of its umbellulas and mericarps are: number of the male pedicels, absence of the sepals in umbellula’s central flower, petals shape, size of the sepals in male flowers, style length and indumentum, hypodermal collenchyma, relative size of the vascular bundles and vallecular vittae, width to thickness ratio of the endosperm, mericarp’s hair length and size of the platelets secretion on the mericarp surface. Here, we provided an emended taxonomic description improved with anatomical and micromorphological characters of the umbellulas and mericarps. Besides, we designated a lectotype and presented a comparison character table as well as a distribution map.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytotaxaSame topicChemical synthesis and alkaloidsFrench-language works237,207