MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366979738 · doi:10.1117/12.2664149

FPGA to study the behavior of a maneuvering UGV using sliding innovation filter

2023· article· en· W4366979738 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayFilter (signal processing)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceNonlinear systemLyapunov functionComputer hardwareArtificial intelligenceComputer visionPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) are increasingly popular due to their customizability, which enables them to be tailored to specific applications, resulting in minimal resource usage that saves energy and space. In this work, we used an FPGA with a Z-board from Xilinx to simulate the application of the sliding innovation filter (SIF) to a robotic arm. SIF is a predictor-corrector filter used for both linear and nonlinear systems to estimate states and/or parameters. It shares similar principles with sliding mode observer and smooth variable structure filter (SVSF) and uses a correction gain derived to satisfy Lyapunov stability, keeping the estimates near the measurements. We tested SIF on a manipulator with two joints (rotational and prismatic), using FPGA to run the simulation while tracking resource utilization. We compared the results with those of SVSF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.305
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207