MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366986885 · doi:10.1080/13698249.2023.2167042

Definitions of Child Recruitment and Use in Armed Conflict: Challenges for Early Warning

2023· article· en· W4366986885 on OpenAlexaff
Michelle Legassicke, Dustin Johnson, Catherine Gribbin

Bibliographic record

VenueCivil Wars · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Peace and Security Dynamics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Red Cross SocietyDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmArmed conflictCriminologyPoliticsPolitical scienceWarning systemPsychologyLawPublic relationsSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recruitment and use of children during armed violence is a serious concern in contemporary conflicts, and early warning systems (EWS) can help prevent, not just ameliorate, the resulting harm to children. Effective EWS need to consider recruitment patterns, children’s experiences, relevant legal and political definitions, and data sources. This paper engages with complexities raised by the interaction of legal, experiential, and social scientific dimensions of the recruitment and use of children through analysing the humanitarian and legal definitions of the recruitment of children in conflicts, datasets on armed conflict, and the issue of large-scale violence by organised criminal groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.616
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.234
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.117 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCivil WarsSame topicGlobal Peace and Security DynamicsFrench-language works237,207