Creating measurement-based oil and gas sector methane inventories using source-resolved aerial surveys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Critical mitigation of methane emissions from the oil and gas (OG) sector is hampered by inaccurate official inventories and limited understanding of contributing sources. Here we present a framework for incorporating aerial measurements into comprehensive OG sector methane inventories that achieves robust, independent quantification of measurement and sample size uncertainties, while providing timely source-level insights. This hybrid inventory combines top-down, source-resolved, multi-pass aerial measurements with bottom-up estimates of unmeasured sources leveraging continuous probability of detection and quantification models for a chosen aerial technology. Notably, the technique explicitly considers skewed source distributions and finite facility populations that have not been previously addressed. The protocol is demonstrated to produce a comprehensive upstream OG sector methane inventory for British Columbia, Canada, which while approximately 1.7 times higher than the most recent official bottom-up inventory, reveals a lower methane intensity of produced natural gas (<0.5%) than comparable estimates for several other regions. Finally, the method and data are used to upper bound the potential influence of source variability/intermittency, directly addressing an open question in the literature. Results demonstrate that even for an extreme case, variability/intermittency effects can be addressed by sample size and survey design and have a minor impact on overall inventory uncertainty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".