MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367024631 · doi:10.1344/ebre38.2018.8.22008

Xarli, el soldat que va morir dues vegades

2018· article· ca· W4367024631 on OpenAlexaff
Francesc Xavier Hernández Cardona

Bibliographic record

VenueEbre 38 · 2018
Typearticle
Languageca
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeological and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La tardor del 2011 investigadors del CSIC i del grup de recerca DIDPATRI de la Universitat de Barcelona, van estar excavant a la zona de Raïmats, un dels escenaris dels darrers combats de la batalla de l’Ebre. En els treballs es van localitzar les restes esquelètiques d’un soldat que havien quedat colgades just en el lloc on havia mort. En conèixer la troballa el Departament de Governació i Relacions Institucionals invocant la Llei de Fosses es va emparar de les restes del soldat i de resultes es va generar una important polèmica sobre el paper de l’administració en les polítiques de memòria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.010
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEbre 38Same topicArchaeological and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207