MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367031761 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2023.3270122

On the Performance of MRC Receivers in UAV-to-Ground Channels With Shadowing

2023· article· en· W4367031761 on OpenAlexaff
Remon Polus, Claude D’Amours

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFadingMaximal-ratio combiningComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)Shadow mappingMonte Carlo methodMoment-generating functionErgodic theoryMoment (physics)Topology (electrical circuits)Bit error rateAlgorithmProbability density functionElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsMathematicsStatisticsPhysicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are expected to become a major component of the beyond fifth-generation (5G) cellular networks in order to provide ubiquitous connectivity. Recently, new statistical fading channel models for UAV-to-ground communications have been introduced to represent shadowing effects in the channel. In this letter, we derive the average bit error rate (ABER), ergodic capacity, and outage probability of a receiver using maximal ratio combining (MRC) operating in independent UAV-to-ground channels based on the moment generating function (MGF). Moreover, the effects of the UAV-to-ground fading model parameters on the system performance have been illustrated via numerical results. By using Monte Carlo simulations, we finally verify all the theoretical expressions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Wireless Communications LettersSame topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207