VALERIAN: Invariant Feature Learning for IMU Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition in the Wild
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep neural network models for IMU sensor-based human activity recognition (HAR) that are trained from controlled, well-curated datasets suffer from poor generalizability in practical deployments. However, data collected from naturalistic settings often contains significant label noise. In this work, we examine two in-the-wild HAR datasets and DivideMix, a state-of-the-art learning with noise labels (LNL) method to understand the extent and impacts of noisy labels in training data. Our empirical analysis reveals that the substantial domain gaps among diverse subjects cause LNL methods to violate a key underlying assumption, namely, neural networks tend to fit simpler (and thus clean) data in early training epochs. Motivated by the insights, we design VALERIAN, an invariant feature learning method for in-the-wild wearable sensor-based HAR. By training a multi-task model with separate task-specific layers for each subject, VALERIAN allows noisy labels to be dealt with individually while benefiting from shared feature representation across subjects. We evaluated VALERIAN on four datasets, two collected in a controlled environment and two in the wild. Experimental results show that VALERIAN significantly outperforms baseline approaches. VALERIAN can correct 75% – 93% of label errors in the source domains. When only 10-second clean labeled data per class is available from a new target subject, even with 40% label noise in training data, it achieves test accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".