Promoting the Differentiation of Neural Progenitor Cells into Oligodendrocytes through the Induction of Olig2 Expression: A Transcriptomic Study Using RNA-seq Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oligodendrocytes are the myelinating cells of the central nervous system that facilitate efficient signal transduction. The loss of these cells and the associated myelin sheath can lead to profound functional deficits. Moreover, oligodendrocytes also play key roles in mediating glial-neuronal interactions, which further speaks to their importance in health and disease. Neural progenitor cells (NPCs) are a promising source of cells for the treatment of oligodendrocyte-related neurological diseases due to their ability to differentiate into a variety of cell types, including oligodendrocytes. However, the efficiency of oligodendrocyte differentiation is often low. In this study, we induced the expression of the Olig2 transcription factor in tripotent NPCs using a doxycycline-inducible promoter, such that the extent of oligodendrocyte differentiation could be carefully regulated. We characterized the differentiation profile and the transcriptome of these inducible oligodendrogenic NPCs (ioNPCs) using a combination of qRT-PCR, immunocytochemistry and RNA sequencing with gene ontology (GO) and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Our results show that the ioNPCs differentiated into a significantly greater proportion of oligodendrocytes than the NPCs. The induction of Olig2 expression was also associated with the upregulation of genes involved in oligodendrocyte development and function, as well as the downregulation of genes involved in other cell lineages. The GO and GSEA analyses further corroborated the oligodendrocyte specification of the ioNPCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".