MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367053668 · doi:10.5430/wjel.v13n5p494

Critical Stylistic Analysis of Trafficking Victims in Corban Addison “A walk Across the Sun”

2023· article· en· W4367053668 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rasha Tareq Awad Al-Zubaidi, Salih Mahadi Adai Al-Mamoori

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of English Language · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyHuman traffickingPerspective (graphical)CriminologyRepresentation (politics)SociologyHistoryPolitical scienceLawPoliticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human trafficking across borders and even continents is one of the numerous ways that slavery is practiced today. For the victims, the effects are invariably devastating. The harsh world of child prostitution is described in a novel .The present study shed light on the issues of human trafficking and its impact in the lives of human beings. Critical stylistic analysis seeking the ideological consequences of human trafficking that deals with literary representation i.e novel of “A walk across the Sun” by Corban Addison who pay attention for different aspects of human exploitation where in victim of sex trafficking as a common trade of exploitation. The study focuses ideological perspective of human trafficking. The analysis of the discourse “A walk across the Sun” explore the traumatic conditions of young victims of trafficking of trafficking .The hidden ideologies of the novel reveal the concept of domination, violence, maltreatment of women. By analyzing of the text critical stylistic applying Jeffries (2010) tools, the researcher identifies different types of human trafficking nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.013
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of English LanguageSame topicSex work and related issuesFrench-language works237,207