Towards an Intelligent Assistive System Based on Augmented Reality and Serious Games
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Age-related cognitive impairment is generally characterized by gradual memory loss and decision-making difficulties. The aim of this study is to investigate multi-level support and suggest relevant helping means for the elderly with mild cognitive impairment as well as their caregivers as the primary end-users. This work reports preliminary results on an intelligent assistive system achieved through the integration of the Internet of Things, augmented reality, and adaptive fuzzy decision-making methods. The proposed system operates in different modes, including automated and semi-automated modes. The former helps the user complete their daily life activities by showing augmented reality messages or making automatic changes; while the latter allows manual changes after the real-time assessment of the user’s cognitive state based on the augmented reality serious game score. We have also evaluated the accuracy of the serious game score with 37 elderly participants and compared it with users’ paper-based cognitive test results. We further noted that there is an acceptable correlation between the paper-based test and users’ serious game scores. Moreover, we observed that the system response in
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".