MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367055489 · doi:10.1186/s13059-023-02935-8

A comprehensive map of human glucokinase variant activity

2023· article· en· W4367055489 on OpenAlexafffund
Sarah Gersing, Matteo Cagiada, Marinella Gebbia, Anette P. Gjesing, Atina G. Coté, Gireesh Seesankar, Roujia Li, Daniel Tabet, Jochen Weile, Amelie Stein, Anna L. Gloyn, Torben Hansen, Frederick P. Roth, Kresten Lindorff‐Larsen, Rasmus Hartmann‐Petersen

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome biology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Human Genome Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNovo Nordisk FondenLundbeckfondenWellcome TrustNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNatur og Univers, Det Frie Forskningsråd
KeywordsGlucokinaseMissense mutationMaturity onset diabetes of the youngBiologyNonsense mutationGlucose homeostasisGeneticsMutationInsulinEndocrinologyGeneInsulin resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Glucokinase (GCK) regulates insulin secretion to maintain appropriate blood glucose levels. Sequence variants can alter GCK activity to cause hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia associated with GCK-maturity-onset diabetes of the young (GCK-MODY), collectively affecting up to 10 million people worldwide. Patients with GCK-MODY are frequently misdiagnosed and treated unnecessarily. Genetic testing can prevent this but is hampered by the challenge of interpreting novel missense variants. RESULT: Here, we exploit a multiplexed yeast complementation assay to measure both hyper- and hypoactive GCK variation, capturing 97% of all possible missense and nonsense variants. Activity scores correlate with in vitro catalytic efficiency, fasting glucose levels in carriers of GCK variants and with evolutionary conservation. Hypoactive variants are concentrated at buried positions, near the active site, and at a region of known importance for GCK conformational dynamics. Some hyperactive variants shift the conformational equilibrium towards the active state through a relative destabilization of the inactive conformation. CONCLUSION: Our comprehensive assessment of GCK variant activity promises to facilitate variant interpretation and diagnosis, expand our mechanistic understanding of hyperactive variants, and inform development of therapeutics targeting GCK.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.556

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome biologySame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207