MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367145270 · doi:10.1121/10.0019128

Decorrelated compounding methods in synthetic transmit aperture ultrasound imaging and its application

2023· article· en· W4367145270 on OpenAlexaff
Yuan Xu, Na Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecorrelationSpeckle patternCompoundingUltrasoundAttenuationSpeckle noiseInterference (communication)Computer scienceUltrasonic sensorOpticsAcousticsMaterials sciencePhysicsComputer visionTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Speckles exist in most ultrasound images. They are generated due to the interference of the ultrasound waves scattered from multiple scattering particles in one resolution cell. Although they are very useful in many ultrasound applications, they limit the detection of low-contrast targets in a scattering medium. In conventional compounding, multiple correlated sub-images from various imaging apertures and frequency bandwidths are generated and then averaged incoherently to reduce the speckles. In this paper, we present our study on a method called Decorrelated Compounding to reduce speckles. In decorrelated compounding, a decorrelation procedure was applied to the correlated sub-images to further reduce speckle variance in synthetic transmit aperture (STA) ultrasound imaging. Decorrelated compounding was shown to improve the detectability of low-contrast lesions in terms of lesion signal-to-noise ratio (lSNR), visual detection, and statistical tests of the performance in detecting low-contrast lesions. The application of the proposed method to monitoring ultrasound thermal therapy and to measuring the attenuation coefficient will also be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207