An Ultra-Low-Power Non-Uniform Derivative-Based Sampling Scheme With Tunable Accuracy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an ultra-low-power non-uniform sampling scheme using a derivative-based algorithm that can maintain a comparable accuracy to other non-uniform sampling schemes but with less complexity and lower power consumption. In this method, the change in the derivative of the signal above certain threshold values is used to identify high signal activity for retention of the significant points of the signal. The scheme is implemented using simple building blocks that calculate and compare the change in approximate real-time derivative to a tunable threshed value that can be adjusted to obtain the desired Compression Factor (CF) and Post-Reconstruction Signal-to-Noise plus Distortion Ratio (PR-SNDR) for different signal types. Fabricated in TSMC’s$0.13 \mu \text{m}$CMOS technology and tested with real-world biomedical signals, the proposed Derivative Dependent Sampling (DDS) system consumes a maximum power of 155 nW while achieving a CF of more than 6 for an Electrocardiography (ECG) signal. By adding the proposed DDS block to a data acquisition and processing system, the non-uniform sampling can reduce the power dissipation of the entire system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".