Compatibilidad de soluciones PPP en línea considerando distintos tiempos de medición respecto a soluciones semanales SIRGAS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Precise Point Positioning (PPP) online was carried out on a set of daily observation files belonging to 13 GNSS stations of continuous operation in Costa Rica, which were adapted to three-time intervals: 24 hours, 6 hours in the morning and 6 hours in the afternoon. The study was conducted between week 1934 and week 1986. The main objective was to determine the influence of the different time intervals on the PPP solutions obtained through the Canadian CSRS-PPP online service and their discrepancies with respect to the coordinates calculated weekly by the Sistema de Referencia Geodésico para las Américas (SIRGAS) and that are currently linked to the ITRF2014/IGb2014 solution. The results showed that the differences in the geocentric components, in addition to the time interval used in the processing, also depend on the geographical location, which represents an element to consider if users contemplate this online service as an option for computation of GNSS observations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it