MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367149211 · doi:10.1021/cen-09944-buscon8

Cepsa carves out petrochemical unit

2021· article· en· W4367149211 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alex Scott

Bibliographic record

VenueC&EN Global Enterprise · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicChemistry and Chemical Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetrochemicalChinaUnit (ring theory)BusinessDivision (mathematics)Strategic business unitNew energyCommerceWaste managementEngineeringGeographyMarketingArchaeologyMechanical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Spanish energy group Cepsa has carved out its chemical division, and in January the unit will begin operating as an independent business. Cepsa says it will review “all strategic options” for the chemical business. Last year the business had sales of about $2.9 billion of petrochemicals including phenol, linear alkylbenzene, and paraffins, from plants in Brazil, Canada, China, Germany, Indonesia, and Spain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3520.148

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueC&EN Global EnterpriseSame topicChemistry and Chemical EngineeringFrench-language works237,207